After thousands of years of accumulation in China's rural areas, it has formed an inherent cultural tradition, whether it is rural rejuvenation or rural governance. Without this foundation, it is doomed to take root.
Nowadays, many places are carrying out rural environmental improvement, and some of them are very effective and others are not very realistic. The media quoted a survey of relevant experts who said that in some places, regardless of farmers' production and life, they pushed for a "one-size-fits-all" approach, and farmers were disgusted.
Everyone wants a good living environment. There is no unwelcome reason for people to manage dirty and messy people. However, in order to have a good environment, not allowing farmers to raise pigs and ducks, and not allowing melon, fruits and vegetables to be planted at the door of their homes may also cause a situation of "cutting feet and performing well". The fundamental purpose of all rural governance activities, including environmental rectification, is to make rural people's lives better, not to concoct a "uniform" governance performance.
The country is the country of people living in the country. What we often say is "ground gas", which is connected with the fireworks in the world. It is "the back eaves of Yuliu Yin, in front of Taoli Luotang." It's a big difference. It doesn't have the convenience of buying eggs and fruits at the fresh supermarket as soon as it lifts its feet, but it has a self-sufficient courtyard and a rural garden. "Behind the house and the front, grow melon and grow beans" is a production and life model formed by generations; chickens and ducks in groups, and the prosperity of six animals are the basic signs of peasant life; Both the buildings and the courtyards have "experienced the time, the test of the environment, the response of customs, the selection of species", and they are the basic reason why the countryside is a rural area. What rural governance needs to do is to complement the shortcomings of rural existence, not to eliminate rural living models, traditional customs and even survival methods.
In the process of rural governance, we must always be alert to the wrong thinking of "rural governance with urban thinking". For leading cadres, before formulating a plan and starting rectification, they should conduct in-depth investigations and studies, listen to the opinions of the people, and then move on. China is a large traditional agricultural country. Even if the goal of poverty alleviation is fulfilled, many villages cannot completely get rid of the production and living conditions of small farmers. This is a reality that must be faced squarely. After thousands of years of accumulation in China's rural areas, it has formed an inherent cultural tradition, whether it is rural rejuvenation or rural governance. Without this foundation, it is doomed to take root. Rural environment improvement requires changing many farmers' living habits, but it does not completely separate them from the original production and lifestyle. Why do some people like to ban "one-size-fits-all" bans? This is to make the effect of governance "immediate" and make the governance uniform, but they have not fully considered whether the people are willing. Those practices that are not practical are often difficult to implement because they are "ungrounded."
As Mr. Fei Xiaotong pointed out in "Local China", "the change of rural society is very slow." The reality of the countryside is there. Only by working on the establishment of a long-term mechanism, we can actively guide farmers to learn about waste disposal, Start with the details of the ecological cycle, down-to-earth, respect the local soil, and create new pastoral songs in accordance with local conditions. (Li Sihui)
Hosted by the Office of the Steering Committee for the Construction of Spiritual Civilization of Hubei Province Technical Support: Jingchu.com E-mail: email@example.com 沪 ICP 备 18025215 号